On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 01:00:03PM -0700, Luck, Tony wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 09:17:11PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 11:18:09AM -0700, Luck, Tony wrote:
> > > Counter proposal. We don't need the temp mci_status because we exit the
> > > loop early. Nor the "ret" variable.
> > >
> > >
> > > How does this look?
> >
> > Yap, better. I'll test it later or tomorrow:
> >
>
> Or even better. Just adds the "mce_read_aux()" to check ADDRV and MISCV
> and populate more of the struct mce.
I thought about it but decided to leave it for another day. But ok, it
is a one more line and I guess it is ok to have it in the same patch,
I'll add it.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
