* Miklos Szeredi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > This change causes the memory access of the "easy" spin-loop portion
> > > > to be more agressive: after the REP; NOP we'd not do the 'easy-loop'
> > > > with a simple CMPB, but we'd re-attempt the atomic op.
> > >
> > > It looks as if this is going to overflow of the lock counter, no?
> >
> > hm, what do you mean? There's no lock counter.
>
> I mean, the repeated calls to decb will pretty soon make lock->slock
> wrap around.
ugh, indeed, bad thinko on my part. I'll rework this.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
