Hi Thomas,
On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 5:57 PM Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Jun 2018, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > Submitters of device tree binding documentation may forget to CC
> > the subsystem maintainer if this is missing.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > v3:
> > - Update for next-20180622,
> >
> > v2:
> > - No changes.
> >
> > Impact on "scripts/get_maintainer.pl -f
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/x86/":
> >
> > -Rob Herring <[email protected]> (maintainer:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED
> > DEVICE TREE BINDINGS,commit_signer:1/1=100%)
> > +Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> (maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT
> > AND 64-BIT))
>
> I assume there is no way to make sure that Rob and the device tree folks
> are on top of that list? While it's somehow x86 related most of the
> devicetree details are way over my head. :)
I think the order is from most-specific to least-specific.
> I'll pick it up nevertheless
Thanks!
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- [email protected]
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
