This commit converts rcu_gpnum_ovf() to use ->gp_seq instead of ->gpnum.
Same size unsigned long, so same approach.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]>
---
 kernel/rcu/tree.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index a8c19363c979..eda23797a7f4 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -1089,14 +1089,15 @@ static int rcu_is_cpu_rrupt_from_idle(void)
 /*
  * We are reporting a quiescent state on behalf of some other CPU, so
  * it is our responsibility to check for and handle potential overflow
- * of the rcu_node ->gpnum counter with respect to the rcu_data counters.
+ * of the rcu_node ->gp_seq counter with respect to the rcu_data counters.
  * After all, the CPU might be in deep idle state, and thus executing no
  * code whatsoever.
  */
 static void rcu_gpnum_ovf(struct rcu_node *rnp, struct rcu_data *rdp)
 {
        raw_lockdep_assert_held_rcu_node(rnp);
-       if (ULONG_CMP_LT(READ_ONCE(rdp->gpnum) + ULONG_MAX / 4, rnp->gpnum))
+       if (ULONG_CMP_LT(rcu_seq_current(&rdp->gp_seq) + ULONG_MAX / 4,
+                        rnp->gp_seq))
                WRITE_ONCE(rdp->gpwrap, true);
        if (ULONG_CMP_LT(rdp->rcu_iw_gpnum + ULONG_MAX / 4, rnp->gpnum))
                rdp->rcu_iw_gpnum = rnp->gpnum + ULONG_MAX / 4;
-- 
2.17.1

Reply via email to