On Mon 25 Jun 18:34 PDT 2018, Alex Elder wrote:

> From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.anders...@linaro.org>
> 
> "start" and "stop" are more suitable names for how these two operations
> are used, and they fit better with the upcoming introduction of two
> additional operations in the struct.
> 
> [el...@linaro.org: minor comment edits]
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.anders...@linaro.org>
> Acked-by: Alex Elder <el...@linaro.org>
> Tested-by: Fabien Dessenne <fabien.desse...@st.com>

Sorry for not spotting this before, but per section 11 of
Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst the tag part should read:


Tested-by: Fabien Dessenne <fabien.desse...@st.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.anders...@linaro.org>
[el...@linaro.org: minor comment edits]
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <el...@linaro.org>


I.e. as you're sending the email you must be the last one certifying the
origin of the patch.

Regards,
Bjorn

> ---
>  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 30 ++++++++++++++--------------
>  include/linux/remoteproc.h           | 14 ++++++-------
>  2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c 
> b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> index a9609d971f7f..5dd58e6bea88 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> @@ -774,13 +774,13 @@ static int rproc_handle_resources(struct rproc *rproc,
>       return ret;
>  }
>  
> -static int rproc_probe_subdevices(struct rproc *rproc)
> +static int rproc_start_subdevices(struct rproc *rproc)
>  {
>       struct rproc_subdev *subdev;
>       int ret;
>  
>       list_for_each_entry(subdev, &rproc->subdevs, node) {
> -             ret = subdev->probe(subdev);
> +             ret = subdev->start(subdev);
>               if (ret)
>                       goto unroll_registration;
>       }
> @@ -789,17 +789,17 @@ static int rproc_probe_subdevices(struct rproc *rproc)
>  
>  unroll_registration:
>       list_for_each_entry_continue_reverse(subdev, &rproc->subdevs, node)
> -             subdev->remove(subdev, true);
> +             subdev->stop(subdev, true);
>  
>       return ret;
>  }
>  
> -static void rproc_remove_subdevices(struct rproc *rproc, bool crashed)
> +static void rproc_stop_subdevices(struct rproc *rproc, bool crashed)
>  {
>       struct rproc_subdev *subdev;
>  
>       list_for_each_entry_reverse(subdev, &rproc->subdevs, node)
> -             subdev->remove(subdev, crashed);
> +             subdev->stop(subdev, crashed);
>  }
>  
>  /**
> @@ -901,8 +901,8 @@ static int rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc, const struct 
> firmware *fw)
>               return ret;
>       }
>  
> -     /* probe any subdevices for the remote processor */
> -     ret = rproc_probe_subdevices(rproc);
> +     /* Start any subdevices for the remote processor */
> +     ret = rproc_start_subdevices(rproc);
>       if (ret) {
>               dev_err(dev, "failed to probe subdevices for %s: %d\n",
>                       rproc->name, ret);
> @@ -1014,8 +1014,8 @@ static int rproc_stop(struct rproc *rproc, bool crashed)
>       struct device *dev = &rproc->dev;
>       int ret;
>  
> -     /* remove any subdevices for the remote processor */
> -     rproc_remove_subdevices(rproc, crashed);
> +     /* Stop any subdevices for the remote processor */
> +     rproc_stop_subdevices(rproc, crashed);
>  
>       /* the installed resource table is no longer accessible */
>       rproc->table_ptr = rproc->cached_table;
> @@ -1657,16 +1657,16 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(rproc_del);
>   * rproc_add_subdev() - add a subdevice to a remoteproc
>   * @rproc: rproc handle to add the subdevice to
>   * @subdev: subdev handle to register
> - * @probe: function to call when the rproc boots
> - * @remove: function to call when the rproc shuts down
> + * @start: function to call after the rproc is started
> + * @stop: function to call before the rproc is stopped
>   */
>  void rproc_add_subdev(struct rproc *rproc,
>                     struct rproc_subdev *subdev,
> -                   int (*probe)(struct rproc_subdev *subdev),
> -                   void (*remove)(struct rproc_subdev *subdev, bool crashed))
> +                   int (*start)(struct rproc_subdev *subdev),
> +                   void (*stop)(struct rproc_subdev *subdev, bool crashed))
>  {
> -     subdev->probe = probe;
> -     subdev->remove = remove;
> +     subdev->start = start;
> +     subdev->stop = stop;
>  
>       list_add_tail(&subdev->node, &rproc->subdevs);
>  }
> diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc.h b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> index dfdaede9139e..bf55bf2a5ee1 100644
> --- a/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> +++ b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> @@ -477,15 +477,15 @@ struct rproc {
>  /**
>   * struct rproc_subdev - subdevice tied to a remoteproc
>   * @node: list node related to the rproc subdevs list
> - * @probe: probe function, called as the rproc is started
> - * @remove: remove function, called as the rproc is being stopped, the 
> @crashed
> - *       parameter indicates if this originates from the a recovery
> + * @start: start function, called after the rproc has been started
> + * @stop: stop function, called before the rproc is stopped; the @crashed
> + *       parameter indicates if this originates from a recovery
>   */
>  struct rproc_subdev {
>       struct list_head node;
>  
> -     int (*probe)(struct rproc_subdev *subdev);
> -     void (*remove)(struct rproc_subdev *subdev, bool crashed);
> +     int (*start)(struct rproc_subdev *subdev);
> +     void (*stop)(struct rproc_subdev *subdev, bool crashed);
>  };
>  
>  /* we currently support only two vrings per rvdev */
> @@ -568,8 +568,8 @@ static inline struct rproc *vdev_to_rproc(struct 
> virtio_device *vdev)
>  
>  void rproc_add_subdev(struct rproc *rproc,
>                     struct rproc_subdev *subdev,
> -                   int (*probe)(struct rproc_subdev *subdev),
> -                   void (*remove)(struct rproc_subdev *subdev, bool 
> crashed));
> +                   int (*start)(struct rproc_subdev *subdev),
> +                   void (*stop)(struct rproc_subdev *subdev, bool crashed));
>  
>  void rproc_remove_subdev(struct rproc *rproc, struct rproc_subdev *subdev);
>  
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 

Reply via email to