On 06/27/2018 02:35 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 27 June 2018 at 10:55, Rajendra Nayak <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 05/30/2018 08:00 PM, Jon Hunter wrote:
>>>>> My only other comments on this series are ...
>>>>>
>>>>> 1. I think it would be nice to have an dev_pm_domain_attach_by_name() and
>>>>> that the DT binding has a 'power-domain-names' property.
>>>> I think it makes sense, but my plan was to do that as second step on
>>>> top. Are you okay with that as well?
>>> Yes that is fine with me.
>>
>> Ulf, do you have a patch for this? I am working on moving some of qcom
>> remoteproc drivers to use this series and it will help to have a
>> dev_pm_domain_attach_by_name() api.
>
> Right. Besides this I have been working on a little improvement,
> avoiding to power the PM domain while attaching.
>
> I post a series in a day or two.
great, thank you.
>
> Kind regards
> Uffe
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
