On Wed, 2018-06-27 at 19:39 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 12:21 PM, <honghui.zh...@mediatek.com> wrote:
> > From: Honghui Zhang <honghui.zh...@mediatek.com>
> >
> > Implement remove callback function for Mediatek PCIe driver to add
> > loadable kernel module support.
>
> > +static void mtk_pcie_irq_teardown(struct mtk_pcie *pcie)
> > +{
> > + struct mtk_pcie_port *port, *tmp;
> > +
>
> > + if (list_empty(&pcie->ports))
> > + return;
>
> This is redundant.
Yeah, you are right, I will remove it.
>
> > +
> > + list_for_each_entry_safe(port, tmp, &pcie->ports, list) {
> > + irq_set_chained_handler_and_data(port->irq, NULL, NULL);
> > +
> > + if (port->irq_domain)
> > + irq_domain_remove(port->irq_domain);
> > +
> > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCI_MSI)) {
> > + if (port->msi_domain)
> > + irq_domain_remove(port->msi_domain);
> > + if (port->inner_domain)
> > + irq_domain_remove(port->inner_domain);
> > + }
> > +
> > + irq_dispose_mapping(port->irq);
> > + }
> > +}
>
> > +static void mtk_pcie_free_resources(struct mtk_pcie *pcie)
> > +{
> > + struct pci_host_bridge *host = pci_host_bridge_from_priv(pcie);
> > + struct list_head *windows = &host->windows;
> > +
> > + pci_unmap_iospace(&pcie->pio);
> > + pci_free_resource_list(windows);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int mtk_pcie_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +{
> > + struct mtk_pcie *pcie = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > + struct pci_host_bridge *host = pci_host_bridge_from_priv(pcie);
> > +
> > + pci_stop_root_bus(host->bus);
> > + pci_remove_root_bus(host->bus);
> > + mtk_pcie_free_resources(pcie);
> > +
> > + mtk_pcie_irq_teardown(pcie);
> > +
>
> > + if (!list_empty(&pcie->ports))
>
> I think this is also not needed. Do you put runtime PM by the way?
Yes, it's could be removed.
the pm was putted in mtk_pcie_put_resources which will call
mtk_pcie_subsys_powerdown, and the pm was putted in that function.
thanks.
>
> > + mtk_pcie_put_resources(pcie);
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
>
