On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 08:46:03PM -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote: > @@ -2493,17 +2493,18 @@ static void idle_balance(int this_cpu, s > unsigned long next_balance = jiffies + 60 * HZ; > > for_each_domain(this_cpu, sd) { > - if (sd->flags & SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE) { > + unsigned long interval; > +
Do we need a : if (!(sd->flags & SD_LOAD_BALANCE)) continue; here? Otherwise patch look good and fixes the problem Paul observed earlier. > + if (sd->flags & SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE) > /* If we've pulled tasks over stop searching: */ > - pulled_task = load_balance_newidle(this_cpu, > - this_rq, sd); > - if (time_after(next_balance, > - sd->last_balance + sd->balance_interval)) > - next_balance = sd->last_balance > - + sd->balance_interval; > - if (pulled_task) > - break; > - } > + pulled_task = load_balance_newidle(this_cpu,this_rq, > sd); > + > + interval = msecs_to_jiffies(sd->balance_interval); > + if (time_after(next_balance, > + sd->last_balance + interval)) > + next_balance = sd->last_balance + interval; > + if (pulled_task) > + break; > } > if (!pulled_task) > /* -- Regards, vatsa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/