Hi Michal, On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 2:42 AM Michal Simek <michal.si...@xilinx.com> wrote: > zynq name here is correct which is saying that hardblock is going to be > described. Without it it is suggesting that hardblock is not used and it > is for example on zybo with microblaze.
In my opinion, the zynq name is just adding redundant information to the "xlnx,zynq-7000" value. Taking the Zybo board, the current compatible property is: > compatible = "digilent,zynq-zybo", "xlnx,zynq-7000"; I'm proposing to change it to: > compatible = "digilent,zybo", "xlnx,zynq-7000"; (I know I must keep the old value too, I'm simplifying) In the case of a Zybo board with a microblaze, the property could be: > compatible = "digilent,zybo", "xlnx,microblaze"; That would allow to differentiate between zynq and microblaze. I have no problem on dropping the patch if you like. There might be something that I'm not seeing or a use case that I'm missing. Thanks, Luis Araneda.
