On Mon, Jul 02, 2018 at 06:52:47PM -0400, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> @@ -308,8 +310,17 @@ void pcie_do_fatal_recovery(struct pci_dev *dev, u32 
> service)
>               pci_dev_put(pdev);
>       }
>  
> +     hpsvc = pcie_port_find_service(udev, PCIE_PORT_SERVICE_HP);
> +     hpdev = pcie_port_find_device(udev, PCIE_PORT_SERVICE_HP);
> +
> +     if (hpdev && hpsvc)
> +             hpsvc->mask_irq(to_pcie_device(hpdev));
> +
>       result = reset_link(udev, service);
>  
> +     if (hpdev && hpsvc)
> +             hpsvc->unmask_irq(to_pcie_device(hpdev));
> +

We've already got the ->reset_slot callback in struct hotplug_slot_ops,
I'm wondering if we really need additional ones for this use case.

If you just do...

        if (!pci_probe_reset_slot(dev->slot))
                pci_reset_slot(dev->slot)
        else {
                /* regular code path */
        }

would that not be equivalent?

(It's worth noting though that pciehp is the only hotplug driver
implementing the ->reset_slot callback.  If hotplug is handled by
a different driver or by the platform firmware, devices may still
be removed and re-enumerated twice.)

Thanks,

Lukas

Reply via email to