The calculation of a uniform numa-node size attempted to perform
division with a 64-bit diviser leading to the following failure on
32-bit:
arch/x86/mm/numa_emulation.o: In function
`split_nodes_size_interleave_uniform':
arch/x86/mm/numa_emulation.c:239: undefined reference to `__udivdi3'
Convert the implementation to do the division in terms of pages and then
shift the result back to an absolute physical address.
Fixes: 93e738834fcc ("x86/numa_emulation: Introduce uniform split capability")
Cc: David Rientjes <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Cc: Wei Yang <[email protected]>
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <[email protected]>
---
Applies to tip/x86/cpu for 4.19.
arch/x86/mm/numa_emulation.c | 10 +++++++++-
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa_emulation.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa_emulation.c
index 039db00541b7..cc7523e45926 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/numa_emulation.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa_emulation.c
@@ -198,6 +198,14 @@ static u64 __init find_end_of_node(u64 start, u64
max_addr, u64 size)
return end;
}
+static u64 uniform_size(u64 max_addr, u64 base, int nr_nodes)
+{
+ unsigned long max_pfn = PHYS_PFN(max_addr);
+ unsigned long base_pfn = PHYS_PFN(base);
+
+ return PFN_PHYS((max_pfn - base_pfn) / nr_nodes);
+}
+
/*
* Sets up fake nodes of `size' interleaved over physical nodes ranging from
* `addr' to `max_addr'.
@@ -236,7 +244,7 @@ static int __init
split_nodes_size_interleave_uniform(struct numa_meminfo *ei,
}
if (uniform) {
- min_size = (max_addr - addr) / nr_nodes;
+ min_size = uniform_size(max_addr, addr, nr_nodes);
size = min_size;
} else {
/*
