Hi Sudeep, Andy, Thank you for all the valuable information and knowledge.
Regards, Srinath. On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 3:08 PM, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.ho...@arm.com> wrote: > > > On 04/07/18 10:32, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 6:37 AM, Srinath Mannam >> <srinath.man...@broadcom.com> wrote: >>> Hi Sudeep, Andy, >>> >>> Yes, This patch is to get of_device_id and then fetch data pointer. >>> >>> To add ACPI support in multiple drivers which are device-tree based >>> and has list of of_device_ids, by using this function >>> very minimal changes and can avoid acpi_device_id list in the driver. >>> I will send driver changes where this function used to add ACPI >>> support in following patches. >>> >>> Below are the changes added to add ACPI support in sdhci iproc driver >>> using this function. >> >> So, did you get an ACPI ID for it? >> That's how proper ACPI support should be done. >> >> P.S. What you are trying to do is being discussed with Nikolaus in [1]. >> I have to NAK your approach in any case. Sorry. >> > > +1 on NACK for this and anything else that abuse PRP0001 as a short cut > approach. > > -- > Regards, > Sudeep
