On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 02:13:45PM +0200, Jack Henschel wrote:
> This is the second version of a patch that improves the error
> message of the perf events parser when the PMU hardware does not support
> address filters.
> 
> Previously, the perf returned the following error:
> > $ perf record -e intel_pt// --filter 'filter sys_write'
> > --filter option should follow a -e tracepoint or HW tracer option
> This implies there is some syntax error present in the command line,
> which is not true. Rather, notify the user that the CPU does not have
> support for this feature.
> 
> For example, Intel chips based on the Broadwell micro-archticture have
> the Intel PT PMU, but do not support address filtering.
> 
> Now, perf prints the following error message:
> > $ perf record -e intel_pt// --filter 'filter sys_write'
> > This CPU does not support address filtering
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jack Henschel <[email protected]>

Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>

thanks,
jirka

> ---
>  tools/perf/util/parse-events.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c b/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c
> index 15eec49e71a1..f8cd3e7c9186 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c
> @@ -1991,8 +1991,11 @@ static int set_filter(struct perf_evsel *evsel, const 
> void *arg)
>       int nr_addr_filters = 0;
>       struct perf_pmu *pmu = NULL;
>  
> -     if (evsel == NULL)
> -             goto err;
> +     if (evsel == NULL) {
> +             fprintf(stderr,
> +                     "--filter option should follow a -e tracepoint or HW 
> tracer option\n");
> +             return -1;
> +     }
>  
>       if (evsel->attr.type == PERF_TYPE_TRACEPOINT) {
>               if (perf_evsel__append_tp_filter(evsel, str) < 0) {
> @@ -2014,8 +2017,11 @@ static int set_filter(struct perf_evsel *evsel, const 
> void *arg)
>               perf_pmu__scan_file(pmu, "nr_addr_filters",
>                                   "%d", &nr_addr_filters);
>  
> -     if (!nr_addr_filters)
> -             goto err;
> +     if (!nr_addr_filters) {
> +             fprintf(stderr,
> +                     "This CPU does not support address filtering\n");
> +             return -1;
> +     }
>  
>       if (perf_evsel__append_addr_filter(evsel, str) < 0) {
>               fprintf(stderr,
> @@ -2024,12 +2030,6 @@ static int set_filter(struct perf_evsel *evsel, const 
> void *arg)
>       }
>  
>       return 0;
> -
> -err:
> -     fprintf(stderr,
> -             "--filter option should follow a -e tracepoint or HW tracer 
> option\n");
> -
> -     return -1;
>  }
>  
>  int parse_filter(const struct option *opt, const char *str,
> -- 
> 2.18.0
> 

Reply via email to