On Thu, Jul 05, 2018 at 11:49:19AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Thu, 05 Jul 2018, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 05, 2018 at 10:24:44AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > On Thu, 05 Jul 2018, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
> > >
> > > > Document devicetree bindings for ROHM BD71837 PMIC MFD.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Matti Vaittinen <[email protected]>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <[email protected]>
> > > > ---
> > > > .../devicetree/bindings/mfd/rohm,bd71837-pmic.txt | 67
> > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > 1 file changed, 67 insertions(+)
> > > > create mode 100644
> > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/rohm,bd71837-pmic.txt
> > > > + clock-names = "my-clock";
> > > > + clocks = <&pmic>;
> > > > + };
> > >
> > > Do you have a real example to give?
> >
> > For clock consumer? Sorry, no I don't.
>
> Might be better to drop it for the time being then.
I have tested the clk driver using this dummy consumer. So in a sense it
"works" and can be used as an example on how to write a real clock
consumer node. Thus I see some value in this example node - even if it
does not match to any real world HW. If I had to use the clk from this
PMIC and write HW description I would appreciate this dummy exaple. I
can drop it if you insist - but I would at least like to hear what is
the downside on having it here?
Best regards,
Matti Vaittinen
