On July 5, 2018 12:56:50 AM PDT, Matti Vaittinen
<matti.vaitti...@fi.rohmeurope.com> wrote:
>On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 06:57:39PM +0200, Enric Balletbo Serra wrote:
>> Missatge de Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torok...@gmail.com> del dia dc.,
>4
>> de jul. 2018 a les 17:10:
>> >
>> > Hi Enric,
>> >
>> > On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 11:06:33AM +0200, Enric Balletbo Serra
>wrote:
>> > > Hi Matti,
>> > >
>> > > Thanks for the patch, a few comments below, some are feedback I
>> > > received when I sent some patches to this subsystem.
>> > >
>> > > Missatge de Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaitti...@fi.rohmeurope.com>
>del
>> > > dia dt., 19 de juny 2018 a les 12:57:
>> > > > +};
>> > > > +
>> > > > +/* bd71837 multi function cells */
>> > > > +static struct mfd_cell bd71837_mfd_cells[] = {
>> > > > + {
>> > > > + .name = "bd71837-clk",
>> > > > + }, {
>> > > > + .name = "bd718xx-pwrkey",
>> > > > + .resources = &irqs[0],
>> > > > + .num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(irqs),
>> > > > + }, {
>> > > > + .name = "bd71837-pmic",
>> > > > + },
>> > > nit: no comma at the end
>> >
>> > Actually, trailing comma is preferred on structures/arrays without
>> > sentinels, because if one needs to add a new entry/new member, then
>in
>> > the diff there will have only one new line added, instead of one
>line
>> > being changed (adding now necessary comma) and one added.
>> >
>>
>> Many thanks for sharing your knowledge! That looks to me a good
>> reason.
>
>So in this specific ecample leaving the comma does not help. The
>opening
>brace for new array element would be added to same line where the comma
>is, right?
Ah, yes, you are right. We usually have either:
{ /* element 1 */ },
{ / *element 2 */ },
...
or:
{
/* element 1 */
},
{
/* element 2 */
},
but I do not think that it is codified in the CodingStyle.
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
