On Fri 2018-07-06 11:49:51, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Fri, 6 Jul 2018 23:42:13 +0900 > Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhat...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On (07/06/18 15:47), Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > [..] > > > Fixes: bfe80ed3d7c7 ("vsprintf: add command line option > > > debug_boot_weak_hash") > > > > Seems like this one is still in linux-next. > > Can we squash this patch and bfe80ed3d7c7? > > > > I prefer not to do squashes unless absolutely necessary. Yes, it is in > next, but even branches pulled into next should try to resist rebasing > (I never rebase my next branch unless there is a real bug that will > break bisecting). > > As this is just a warning fix, and not something that should break any > bisect, I say keep it separate. Rebases tend to cause issues.
Ted, just to be sure, are you going to take it via the random tree, please? Best Regards, Petr