On 03-07-18, 14:32, Paul Cercueil wrote:

>  enum jz_version {
> +     ID_JZ4740,
>       ID_JZ4770,
>       ID_JZ4780,
>  };
> @@ -247,6 +248,7 @@ static void jz4780_dma_desc_free(struct virt_dma_desc 
> *vdesc)
>  }
>  
>  static const unsigned int jz4780_dma_ord_max[] = {
> +     [ID_JZ4740] = 5,
>       [ID_JZ4770] = 6,
>       [ID_JZ4780] = 7,
>  };
> @@ -801,11 +803,13 @@ static struct dma_chan *jz4780_of_dma_xlate(struct 
> of_phandle_args *dma_spec,
>  }
>  
>  static const unsigned int jz4780_dma_nb_channels[] = {
> +     [ID_JZ4740] = 6,
>       [ID_JZ4770] = 6,
>       [ID_JZ4780] = 32,
>  };

I feel these should be done away with if we describe hardware in DT

>  
>  static const struct of_device_id jz4780_dma_dt_match[] = {
> +     { .compatible = "ingenic,jz4740-dma", .data = (void *)ID_JZ4740 },

adding .compatible should be the only thing required, if at all for this
addition :)

-- 
~Vinod

Reply via email to