On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 05:47:53PM +0100, Dietmar Eggemann wrote: > A CFS (SCHED_OTHER, SCHED_BATCH or SCHED_IDLE policy) task's > se->runnable_weight must always be in sync with its se->load.weight. > > se->runnable_weight is set to se->load.weight when the task is > forked (init_entity_runnable_average()) or reniced (reweight_entity()). > > There are two cases in set_load_weight() which since they currently only > set se->load.weight could lead to a situation in which se->load.weight > is different to se->runnable_weight for a CFS task: > > (1) A task switches to SCHED_IDLE. > > (2) A SCHED_FIFO, SCHED_RR or SCHED_DEADLINE task which has been reniced > (during which only its static priority gets set) switches to > SCHED_OTHER or SCHED_BATCH. > > Set se->runnable_weight to se->load.weight in these two cases to prevent > this. This eliminates the need to explicitly set it to se->load.weight > during PELT updates in the CFS scheduler fastpath.
Looks good to me. By the way just asking, is there a chance where se_weight(se) and se_runnable(se) can ever be different? Seems not, then in that case we pointlessly do this division in ___update_load_avg if the sa belongs to the task: sa->load_avg = div_u64(load * sa->load_sum, divider); sa->runnable_load_avg = div_u64(runnable * sa->runnable_load_sum, divider); and we could probably just do this if se is a task? sa->load_avg = div_u64(load * sa->load_sum, divider); sa->runnable_load_avg = sa->load_avg; thanks, -Joel