On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 17:34:13 +0200
Alexander Gabert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hi,

Hello Alexander

> 
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~pappy/kernel/linux-2.6.21.5-get_urandom_long-AT_ENTROPY.patch
> 
> this patch adds the function drivers/char/random.c:get_random_long()
> and adds an AT_ENTROPY field in the auxv without config option
> (the config option was removed as suggested by Arjan on LKML).
> 
> README: get_random_long() and AT_ENTROPY support for auxv
> NAME: Alexander Gabert
> EMAIL: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> 
> diff -Nru linux-2.6.21.5.ORIG/drivers/char/random.c 
> linux-2.6.21.5/drivers/char/random.c
> --- linux-2.6.21.5.ORIG/drivers/char/random.c    2007-06-11 
> 20:37:06.000000000 +0200
> +++ linux-2.6.21.5/drivers/char/random.c    2007-06-20 
> 17:00:35.000000000 +0200
> @@ -1654,6 +1654,53 @@
>  }
>  
>  /*
> + * get_random_long() returns a randomized unsigned long word.
> + * It recycles it's entropy cache for a given time period and
> + * uses half_md4_transform to generate a unique return value.
> + * Every REKEY_INTERVAL the cache is reloaded with fresh
> + * randomization data using get_random_bytes().
> + * This function is not intended for strong cryptographic routines.
> + */
> +unsigned long get_random_long(void)
> +{
> +  /* remember the last time we refreshed the cache with random entropy */
> +  static time_t   rekey_time;
> +
> +  time_t          t;
> +
> +  /*
> +   * the following data in the buffer is unchanged during REKEY_INTERVAL:
> +   * |----|----|KKKK|KKKK|KKKK|KKKK|KKKK|KKKK|----|----|----|----|
> +   * ___0____1____2____3____4____5____6____7____8____9___10___11__
> +   *
> +   * the following data is updated during the first half_md4_transform call
> +   * |----|YYYY|----|----|----|----|----|----|ZZZZ|ZZZZ|ZZZZ|ZZZZ|
> +   * ___0____1____2____3____4____5____6____7____8____9___10___11__
> +   *
> +   * the following data is updated during the second half_md4_transform
> +   * |XXXX|----|----|----|----|----|----|----|ZZZZ|ZZZZ|ZZZZ|ZZZZ|
> +   * ___0____1____2____3____4____5____6____7____8____9___10___11__
> +   */
> +  static __u32    entropycache[12];
> +
> +  /* get the current time in seconds */
> +  t = get_seconds();
> +
> +  /* check for REKEY_INTERVAL */
> +  if (t && (!rekey_time || ((t - rekey_time) > REKEY_INTERVAL))) {
> +    rekey_time = t;
> +    /* refresh with random entropy */
> +    get_random_bytes(entropycache, sizeof(entropycache));
> +  }

Maybe this rekeying can be added in rekey_seq_generator(), so that you dont 
have to test rekey_time each time get_random_long() is called. You probably 
could refresh only 8 values, not the full 12 values.

> +
> +  /* transform the buffer to a new state, thus generating new return 
> value */
> +  entropycache[1] = half_md4_transform(entropycache+8, entropycache);
> +  entropycache[0] = half_md4_transform(entropycache+8, entropycache);
> +
> +  return *(unsigned long *)entropycache;

This is not valid on some arches, as entropycache[] alignment (u32 -> 4) might 
be smaller then alignment for a long (4 or 8). 

This also adds about 400 instructions (half_md4_transform() is about 200 
instructions, about 700 bytes of code on x86_64) in exec() path, but this is 
probably minor given the cost of exec()

I am not sure why you unconditionally call half_md4_transform() twice, since 
the entropycache[1] wont be used on 32bits platforms.

I suggest spliting your entropycache into two parts :

One part, with 8 u32, that is read_mostly (and shared by all cpus), updated 
once every 300 seconds in rekey_seq_generator()
static u32 entropycache_shared[8] __read_mostly;

One part, with (16/sizeof(long)) long, percpu to avoid false sharing between 
cpus.
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long , entropycache_pcpu)[16 / sizeof(unsigned 
long)];

then call half_md4_transform() once :

half_md4_transform((u32 *)entropycache_pcpu, entropycache_shared);
return entropycache_pcpu[0];

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to