On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 07:37:05PM +0200, David Sterba wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 06:49:46AM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > > > Dave pointed out that it would be useful to be able to opt-in to full 
> > > > checks
> > > > regardless of CONFIG_REFCOUNT_FULL, so that we can simplify callsites 
> > > > where we
> > > > always want checks. I've spotted a few of these in code which is still 
> > > > awaiting
> > > > conversion.
> > > 
> > > The motivation was code like
> > > 
> > >   WARN_ON(refcount_read(&ref));
> > >   if (refcount_dec_and_test(&ref)) { ... }
> > > 
> > > so the warning is redundant for REFCOUNT_FULL, but I'm going to use the
> > > _checked versions everywhere the performance of refcounts is not
> > > critical.
> > 
> > If you will have conversion patches, do you want to pick this up as the 
> > start
> > of a series?
> 
> The patches where I'd use the enhanced refcounts are nice-to-have and I
> don't have an ETA so it would be better if the patch gets merged
> independently. Thanks.

Ok.

Kees, I will leave this to you.

Mark.

Reply via email to