> -void __ref xen_init_time_ops(void)
> +void __init xen_init_time_ops(void)
>  {
>         pv_time_ops = xen_time_ops;
>
> @@ -542,17 +542,11 @@ void __init xen_hvm_init_time_ops(void)
>                 return;
>
>         if (!xen_feature(XENFEAT_hvm_safe_pvclock)) {
> -               printk(KERN_INFO "Xen doesn't support pvclock on HVM,"
> -                               "disable pv timer\n");
> +               pr_info("Xen doesn't support pvclock on HVM, disable pv 
> timer");
>                 return;
>         }
> -
> -       pv_time_ops = xen_time_ops;
> +       xen_init_time_ops();
>         x86_init.timers.setup_percpu_clockev = xen_time_init;
>         x86_cpuinit.setup_percpu_clockev = xen_hvm_setup_cpu_clockevents;

Boris reported a bug on HVM, which causes a panic in
x86_late_time_init(). It is introduced here: xen_init_time_ops() sets:
x86_init.timers.timer_init = xen_time_init; which was hpet_time_init()
in HVM. However, we might not even need hpet here. Thus, adding
x86_init.timers.timer_init = x86_init_noop; to the end of
xen_hvm_init_time_ops() should be sufficient.

Thank you,
Pavel

Reply via email to