On 13/07/18 14:17, Aapo Vienamo wrote: > Implement and use tegra_sdhci_get_max_clock() which returns the true > maximum host clock rate. The issue with tegra_sdhci_get_max_clock() is
Don't you mean sdhci_pltfm_clk_get_max_clock above? Does this function need fixing then? Or at least should there be another variant added because there is nothing Tegra specific we are doing below? > that it returns the current clock rate of the host instead of the > maximum one, which can lead to unnecessarily small clock rates. > > This differs from the previous implementation of > tegra_sdhci_get_max_clock() in that it doesn't divide the result by two. Why? Fixes tag? Cheers Jon -- nvpublic
