Hello,
On 09/07/2018 16:29:43+0300, Codrin Ciubotariu wrote:
> On 06.07.2018 22:39, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> > Hi Codrin,
> >
> > On 18/06/2018 17:12:38+0300, Codrin Ciubotariu wrote:
> > > From: Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitc...@atmel.com>
> > >
> > > This patch adds DT nodes for I2S0 and I2S1. It also adds an alias for
> > > each I2S node.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitc...@atmel.com>
> > > [codrin.ciubota...@microchip.com: added phandle to new mux clock]
> > > Signed-off-by: Codrin Ciubotariu <codrin.ciubota...@microchip.com>
> > > ---
> > >
> > > The bindings for the I2S node are applied to broonie/sound.git .
> > >
> > > Changes in v5:
> > > - the previous name was:
> > > [PATCH v4 6/7] ARM: dts: at91: sama5d2: add nodes for I2S controllers
> > >
> > > arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d2.dtsi | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d2.dtsi
> > > b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d2.dtsi
> > > index eeb6afa1cda7..eca73ce40bc5 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d2.dtsi
> > > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d2.dtsi
> > > @@ -58,6 +58,8 @@
> > > serial1 = &uart3;
> > > tcb0 = &tcb0;
> > > tcb1 = &tcb1;
> > > + i2s0 = &i2s0;
> > > + i2s1 = &i2s1;
> > > };
> > > cpus {
> > > @@ -1313,6 +1315,22 @@
> > > clocks = <&clk32k>;
> > > };
> > > + i2s0: i2s@f8050000 {
> > > + compatible = "atmel,sama5d2-i2s";
> > > + reg = <0xf8050000 0x100>;
> > > + interrupts = <54 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 7>;
> > > + dmas = <&dma0
> > > + (AT91_XDMAC_DT_MEM_IF(0) |
> > > AT91_XDMAC_DT_PER_IF(1) |
> > > + AT91_XDMAC_DT_PERID(31))>,
> > > + <&dma0
> > > + (AT91_XDMAC_DT_MEM_IF(0) |
> > > AT91_XDMAC_DT_PER_IF(1) |
> > > + AT91_XDMAC_DT_PERID(32))>;
> > > + dma-names = "tx", "rx";
> > > + clocks = <&i2s0_clk>, <&i2s0_gclk>,
> > > <&audio_pll_pmc>, <&i2s0muxck>;
> > > + clock-names = "pclk", "gclk", "aclk", "muxclk";
> > > + status = "disabled";
> > > + };
> > > +
> >
> > Can you resend the DTS patches after removing the unnecessary clocks?
>
> I will. Should I also make the "muxclk" clock an assigned clock to assign
> its parent ?
>
It would be better if that allows to remove the corresponding code in
the driver.
--
Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons)
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
