Hi Krzysztof,

On 18 July 2018 at 19:25, Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 18 July 2018 at 14:59, Anand Moon <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Add missing GIC interrupts property for pwm nodes.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Anand Moon <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> Fixed the patch indentation issue with all tabs.
>> sorry checkpatch could not figure out the error.
>> ---
>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5.dtsi | 5 +++++
>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5.dtsi
>> index 5d2f0a0..f48fb9b 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5.dtsi
>> @@ -169,6 +169,11 @@
>>                 pwm: pwm@12dd0000 {
>>                         compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-pwm";
>>                         reg = <0x12DD0000 0x100>;
>> +                       interrupts = <GIC_SPI 36 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>> +                                       <GIC_SPI 37 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>> +                                       <GIC_SPI 38 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>> +                                       <GIC_SPI 39 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>> +                                       <GIC_SPI 40 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>
> OK, thanks for v2. Now only tabs are used but in previous mail I
> mentioned which example to use - the rtc node which nicely aligns
> continued lines. Why you did not follow this alignment?
>
> I'll fix it when applying, no need to resend.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof

Thanks, I follow the tab protocol otherwise checkpatch would have
complained of tab/space issue.

Best Regards
-Anand

Reply via email to