On Thu, 19 Jul 2018 01:57:07 +0200
Janusz Krzysztofik <jmkrzy...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Data port used by the driver is actually an OMAP MPUIO device, already
> under control of gpio-omap driver.  For that reason we used to not
> request the memory region of the port as that would fail because the
> region is already busy.  Despite that, we are still accessing the port
> by just ioremapping it and performing read/write operations.  Moreover,
> we are doing that without any proteciton from other users legally
> manipulating the port pins over GPIO API.
> 
> The plan is to convert the driver to access the port over functions
> exposed by the gpio-omap driver.  Before that happens, we can already
> obtain exclusive access to the port by requesting an array of its GPIO
> descriptors.  For that to work on Amstrad Delta, respective GPIO lookup
> table entries are added to the board init file.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <jmkrzy...@gmail.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-omap1/board-ams-delta.c | 11 ++++++++++-
>  drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ams-delta.c      |  8 ++++++++

Can we split that in 2 patches: one adding data entries to the lookup
table, and another one patching the driver to request the gpiod array.

>  2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap1/board-ams-delta.c 
> b/arch/arm/mach-omap1/board-ams-delta.c
> index eedacdfe9725..16f7bbe47607 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap1/board-ams-delta.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap1/board-ams-delta.c
> @@ -337,7 +337,8 @@ static struct platform_device ams_delta_nand_device = {
>       .resource       = ams_delta_nand_resources,
>  };
>  
> -#define OMAP_GPIO_LABEL      "gpio-0-15"
> +#define OMAP_GPIO_LABEL              "gpio-0-15"
> +#define OMAP_MPUIO_LABEL     "mpuio"
>  
>  static struct gpiod_lookup_table ams_delta_nand_gpio_table = {
>       .table = {
> @@ -349,6 +350,14 @@ static struct gpiod_lookup_table 
> ams_delta_nand_gpio_table = {
>               GPIO_LOOKUP(LATCH2_LABEL, LATCH2_PIN_NAND_NWE, "nwe", 0),
>               GPIO_LOOKUP(LATCH2_LABEL, LATCH2_PIN_NAND_ALE, "ale", 0),
>               GPIO_LOOKUP(LATCH2_LABEL, LATCH2_PIN_NAND_CLE, "cle", 0),
> +             GPIO_LOOKUP_IDX(OMAP_MPUIO_LABEL, 0, "data", 0, 0),
> +             GPIO_LOOKUP_IDX(OMAP_MPUIO_LABEL, 1, "data", 1, 0),
> +             GPIO_LOOKUP_IDX(OMAP_MPUIO_LABEL, 2, "data", 2, 0),
> +             GPIO_LOOKUP_IDX(OMAP_MPUIO_LABEL, 3, "data", 3, 0),
> +             GPIO_LOOKUP_IDX(OMAP_MPUIO_LABEL, 4, "data", 4, 0),
> +             GPIO_LOOKUP_IDX(OMAP_MPUIO_LABEL, 5, "data", 5, 0),
> +             GPIO_LOOKUP_IDX(OMAP_MPUIO_LABEL, 6, "data", 6, 0),
> +             GPIO_LOOKUP_IDX(OMAP_MPUIO_LABEL, 7, "data", 7, 0),
>               { },
>       },
>  };
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ams-delta.c 
> b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ams-delta.c
> index d7e4c9dbef67..ad62c0245458 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ams-delta.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ams-delta.c
> @@ -189,6 +189,7 @@ static int ams_delta_init(struct platform_device *pdev)
>       struct mtd_info *mtd;
>       struct resource *res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
>       void __iomem *io_base;
> +     struct gpio_descs *data_gpiods;
>       int err = 0;
>  
>       if (!res)
> @@ -289,6 +290,13 @@ static int ams_delta_init(struct platform_device *pdev)
>               dev_err(&pdev->dev, "CLE GPIO request failed (%d)\n", err);
>               goto out_mtd;
>       }
> +     /* Request array of data pins, initialize them as output and set low */
> +     data_gpiods = devm_gpiod_get_array(&pdev->dev, "data", GPIOD_OUT_LOW);
> +     if (IS_ERR(data_gpiods)) {
> +             err = PTR_ERR(data_gpiods);
> +             dev_err(&pdev->dev, "data GPIO request failed: %d\n", err);
> +             goto out_mtd;
> +     }
>  
>       /* Scan to find existence of the device */
>       err = nand_scan(mtd, 1);

Reply via email to