On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 02:36:21PM -0400, Tyler Baicar wrote:
> With the current ghes_edac setup, it seems the only way this could
> work would be to have the firmware always report the module value to
My experience with firmware so far is that it is a lost cause,
considering all the bugs, snafus and incompleteness it demonstrates...
> The other obvious but more messy way would be to have notifiers
> register to be called by ghes_edac and have a custom EDAC driver for
> each CPU to properly populate their layer information.
... which is what we do on x86 and whitelist only known-good platforms
in ghes_edac, which claim that their fw info is correct.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
