On 19/07/18 20:59, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 06:11:41PM +0100, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
Add support for using TMC-ETR as backend for ETM perf tracing.
We use software double buffering at the moment. i.e, the TMC-ETR
uses a separate buffer than the perf ring buffer. The data is
copied to the perf ring buffer once a session completes.

The TMC-ETR would try to match the larger of perf ring buffer
or the ETR buffer size configured via sysfs, scaling down to
a minimum limit of 1MB.

Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poir...@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poul...@arm.com>
---

+       CS_UNLOCK(drvdata->base);
+
+       tmc_flush_and_stop(drvdata);
+       tmc_sync_etr_buf(drvdata);
+
+       CS_UNLOCK(drvdata->base);

This is a copy/paste oversight, here you want to lock again.

Thanks for catching that, will fix it.


+       /* Reset perf specific data */
+       drvdata->perf_data = NULL;
+       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&drvdata->spinlock, flags);
+
+       size = etr_buf->len;
+       tmc_etr_sync_perf_buffer(etr_perf);
+
+       /*
+        * Update handle->head in snapshot mode. Also update the size to the
+        * hardware buffer size if there was an overflow.
+        */
+       if (etr_perf->snapshot) {
+               handle->head += size;
+               if (etr_buf->full)
+                       size = etr_buf->size;
+       }
+
+       lost |= etr_buf->full;
+out:
+       if (lost)
+               perf_aux_output_flag(handle, PERF_AUX_FLAG_TRUNCATED);
+       return size;
+}
+
  static int tmc_enable_etr_sink_perf(struct coresight_device *csdev, void 
*data)
  {
-       /* We don't support perf mode yet ! */
-       return -EINVAL;
+       int rc = 0;
+       unsigned long flags;
+       struct tmc_drvdata *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(csdev->dev.parent);
+       struct perf_output_handle *handle = data;
+       struct etr_perf_buffer *etr_perf = etm_perf_sink_config(handle);
+
+       spin_lock_irqsave(&drvdata->spinlock, flags);
+       /*
+        * There can be only one writer per sink in perf mode. If the sink
+        * is already open in SYSFS mode, we can't use it.
+        */
+       if (drvdata->mode != CS_MODE_DISABLED || drvdata->perf_data) {
+               rc = -EBUSY;

As discussed in the previous patch, I am missing a WARN_ON here : i.e,

   +    if (drvdata->mode != CS_MODE_DISABLED || WARN_ON(drvdata->perf_data))

which was there in the previous version in set_buffer, which triggered some
warnings for me with testing.

+               goto unlock_out;
+       }
+
+       if (WARN_ON(!etr_perf || !etr_perf->etr_buf)) {
+               rc = -EINVAL;
+               goto unlock_out;
+       }
+
+       etr_perf->head = PERF_IDX2OFF(handle->head, etr_perf);
+       drvdata->perf_data = etr_perf;
+       drvdata->mode = CS_MODE_PERF;
+       tmc_etr_enable_hw(drvdata, etr_perf->etr_buf);
+
+unlock_out:
+       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&drvdata->spinlock, flags);
+       return rc;
  }
static int tmc_enable_etr_sink(struct coresight_device *csdev,
@@ -1148,6 +1389,9 @@ static void tmc_disable_etr_sink(struct coresight_device 
*csdev)
  static const struct coresight_ops_sink tmc_etr_sink_ops = {
        .enable         = tmc_enable_etr_sink,
        .disable        = tmc_disable_etr_sink,
+       .alloc_buffer   = tmc_etr_alloc_perf_buffer,
+       .update_buffer  = tmc_etr_update_perf_buffer,
+       .free_buffer    = tmc_etr_free_perf_buffer,


        .alloc_buffer   = tmc_alloc_etr_buffer,
        .update_buffer  = tmc_update_etr_buffer,
        .free_buffer    = tmc_free_etr_buffer,

To be consistant with .enable and .disable along with the naming convention on
the ETF side.


Sure, I can change them.

Cheers
Suzuki

Reply via email to