4.17-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Sean Wang <sean.w...@mediatek.com>

commit de227ed7965d06dcfcd06376e03c107004a4881c upstream.

If the pinctrl node has the gpio-ranges property, the range will be added
by the gpio core and doesn't need to be added by the pinctrl driver.

But for keeping backward compatibility, an explicit pinctrl_add_gpio_range
is still needed to be called when there is a missing gpio-ranges in pinctrl
node in old dts files.

Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: d6ed93551320 ("pinctrl: mediatek: add pinctrl driver for MT7622 SoC")
Signed-off-by: Sean Wang <sean.w...@mediatek.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.wall...@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mt7622.c |   19 ++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mt7622.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mt7622.c
@@ -1463,11 +1463,20 @@ static int mtk_build_gpiochip(struct mtk
        if (ret < 0)
                return ret;
 
-       ret = gpiochip_add_pin_range(chip, dev_name(hw->dev), 0, 0,
-                                    chip->ngpio);
-       if (ret < 0) {
-               gpiochip_remove(chip);
-               return ret;
+       /* Just for backward compatible for these old pinctrl nodes without
+        * "gpio-ranges" property. Otherwise, called directly from a
+        * DeviceTree-supported pinctrl driver is DEPRECATED.
+        * Please see Section 2.1 of
+        * Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio.txt on how to
+        * bind pinctrl and gpio drivers via the "gpio-ranges" property.
+        */
+       if (!of_find_property(np, "gpio-ranges", NULL)) {
+               ret = gpiochip_add_pin_range(chip, dev_name(hw->dev), 0, 0,
+                                            chip->ngpio);
+               if (ret < 0) {
+                       gpiochip_remove(chip);
+                       return ret;
+               }
        }
 
        return 0;


Reply via email to