4.17-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: David Ahern <dsah...@gmail.com>

[ Upstream commit 8c43bd1706885ba1acfa88da02bc60a2ec16f68c ]

Similar to 69678bcd4d2d ("udp: fix SO_BINDTODEVICE"), TCP socket lookups
need to fail if dev_match is not true. Currently, a packet to a given port
can match a socket bound to device when it should not. In the VRF case,
this causes the lookup to hit a VRF socket and not a global socket
resulting in a response trying to go through the VRF when it should not.

Fixes: 3fa6f616a7a4d ("net: ipv4: add second dif to inet socket lookups")
Fixes: 4297a0ef08572 ("net: ipv6: add second dif to inet6 socket lookups")
Reported-by: Lou Berger <lber...@labn.net>
Diagnosed-by: Renato Westphal <ren...@opensourcerouting.org>
Tested-by: Renato Westphal <ren...@opensourcerouting.org>
Signed-off-by: David Ahern <dsah...@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <da...@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c  |    4 ++--
 net/ipv6/inet6_hashtables.c |    4 ++--
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c
@@ -243,9 +243,9 @@ static inline int compute_score(struct s
                        bool dev_match = (sk->sk_bound_dev_if == dif ||
                                          sk->sk_bound_dev_if == sdif);
 
-                       if (exact_dif && !dev_match)
+                       if (!dev_match)
                                return -1;
-                       if (sk->sk_bound_dev_if && dev_match)
+                       if (sk->sk_bound_dev_if)
                                score += 4;
                }
                if (sk->sk_incoming_cpu == raw_smp_processor_id())
--- a/net/ipv6/inet6_hashtables.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/inet6_hashtables.c
@@ -113,9 +113,9 @@ static inline int compute_score(struct s
                        bool dev_match = (sk->sk_bound_dev_if == dif ||
                                          sk->sk_bound_dev_if == sdif);
 
-                       if (exact_dif && !dev_match)
+                       if (!dev_match)
                                return -1;
-                       if (sk->sk_bound_dev_if && dev_match)
+                       if (sk->sk_bound_dev_if)
                                score++;
                }
                if (sk->sk_incoming_cpu == raw_smp_processor_id())


Reply via email to