On Wed, 18 Jul 2018 16:42:09 +0530
Manish Narani <manish.nar...@xilinx.com> wrote:

> This patch removes dead code from xadc_zynq_setup. The condition
> "if (tck_rate > XADC_ZYNQ_TCK_RATE_MAX)" cannot be true at any point of
> time. There is also an incompatible parameter used in the code.
> This patch fixes the same reported by coverity.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Manish Narani <manish.nar...@xilinx.com>

Applied to the togreg branch of iio.git and pushed out as testing
for the autobuilders to try and break it.

Thanks,

Jonathan

> ---
>  drivers/iio/adc/xilinx-xadc-core.c | 4 +---
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/xilinx-xadc-core.c 
> b/drivers/iio/adc/xilinx-xadc-core.c
> index 27b45df..248cffa 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/xilinx-xadc-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/xilinx-xadc-core.c
> @@ -341,8 +341,6 @@ static int xadc_zynq_setup(struct platform_device *pdev,
>  
>       pcap_rate = clk_get_rate(xadc->clk);
>  
> -     if (tck_rate > XADC_ZYNQ_TCK_RATE_MAX)
> -             tck_rate = XADC_ZYNQ_TCK_RATE_MAX;
>       if (tck_rate > pcap_rate / 2) {
>               div = 2;
>       } else {
> @@ -1045,7 +1043,7 @@ static int xadc_parse_dt(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, 
> struct device_node *np,
>       unsigned int num_channels;
>       const char *external_mux;
>       u32 ext_mux_chan;
> -     int reg;
> +     u32 reg;
>       int ret;
>  
>       *conf = 0;

Reply via email to