On Fri, 20 Jul 2018 17:15:15 +0200
Miquel Raynal <miquel.ray...@bootlin.com> wrote:
> As already done in the core, calling a struct nand_controller
> 'hw_control' is misleading. Use the same name as in nand_base.c:
> 'controller'.
>
> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.ray...@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezil...@bootlin.com>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/txx9ndfmc.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/txx9ndfmc.c
> b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/txx9ndfmc.c
> index 8f5bbbac4612..9019022774f7 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/txx9ndfmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/txx9ndfmc.c
> @@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ struct txx9ndfmc_drvdata {
> void __iomem *base;
> unsigned char hold; /* in gbusclock */
> unsigned char spw; /* in gbusclock */
> - struct nand_controller hw_control;
> + struct nand_controller controller;
> };
>
> static struct platform_device *mtd_to_platdev(struct mtd_info *mtd)
> @@ -303,7 +303,7 @@ static int __init txx9ndfmc_probe(struct platform_device
> *dev)
> dev_info(&dev->dev, "CLK:%ldMHz HOLD:%d SPW:%d\n",
> (gbusclk + 500000) / 1000000, hold, spw);
>
> - nand_controller_init(&drvdata->hw_control);
> + nand_controller_init(&drvdata->controller);
>
> platform_set_drvdata(dev, drvdata);
> txx9ndfmc_initialize(dev);
> @@ -337,7 +337,7 @@ static int __init txx9ndfmc_probe(struct platform_device
> *dev)
> chip->ecc.bytes = 3;
> chip->ecc.strength = 1;
> chip->chip_delay = 100;
> - chip->controller = &drvdata->hw_control;
> + chip->controller = &drvdata->controller;
>
> nand_set_controller_data(chip, txx9_priv);
> txx9_priv->dev = dev;
