On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 6:17 AM, Matthias Kaehlcke <m...@chromium.org> wrote:
> Hi Amit,
>
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 01:19:17PM +0530, Amit Kucheria wrote:
>> One thermal zone per cpu is defined
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Amit Kucheria <amit.kuche...@linaro.org>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi | 170
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 170 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
>> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
>> index 01ff146..a75be7c 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
>> @@ -340,4 +340,174 @@
>> };
>> };
>> };
>> +
>> + thermal-zones {
>> + cpu0-thermal {
>> + polling-delay-passive = <250>;
>> + polling-delay = <1000>;
>
> In the context of the TSENS patches you mentioned that you are working
> on interrupt support. Can the polling delays be removed once that is merged?
Yes, that'd be the idea.
>
>> + thermal-sensors = <&tsens0 1>;
>> +
>> + trips {
>> + cpu_alert0: trip0 {
>> + temperature = <75000>;
>> + hysteresis = <2000>;
>> + type = "passive";
>> + };
>> +
>> + cpu_crit0: trip1 {
>> + temperature = <110000>;
>> + hysteresis = <1000>;
>> + type = "critical";
>> + };
>> + };
>> + };
>> +
>> + cpu1-thermal {
>> + polling-delay-passive = <250>;
>> + polling-delay = <1000>;
>> +
>> + thermal-sensors = <&tsens0 2>;
>> +
>> + trips {
>> + cpu_alert1: trip0 {
>> + temperature = <75000>;
>> + hysteresis = <2000>;
>> + type = "passive";
>> + };
>> +
>> + cpu_crit1: trip1 {
>> + temperature = <110000>;
>> + hysteresis = <1000>;
>> + type = "critical";
>> + };
>> + };
>> + };
>> +
>> + cpu2-thermal {
>> + polling-delay-passive = <250>;
>> + polling-delay = <1000>;
>> +
>> + thermal-sensors = <&tsens0 3>;
>> +
>> + trips {
>> + cpu_alert2: trip0 {
>> + temperature = <75000>;
>> + hysteresis = <2000>;
>> + type = "passive";
>> + };
>> +
>> + cpu_crit2: trip1 {
>> + temperature = <110000>;
>> + hysteresis = <1000>;
>> + type = "critical";
>> + };
>> + };
>> + };
>> +
>> + cpu3-thermal {
>> + polling-delay-passive = <250>;
>> + polling-delay = <1000>;
>> +
>> + thermal-sensors = <&tsens0 4>;
>> +
>> + trips {
>> + cpu_alert3: trip0 {
>> + temperature = <75000>;
>> + hysteresis = <2000>;
>> + type = "passive";
>> + };
>> +
>> + cpu_crit3: trip1 {
>> + temperature = <110000>;
>> + hysteresis = <1000>;
>> + type = "critical";
>> + };
>> + };
>> + };
>> +
>> + cpu4-thermal {
>> + polling-delay-passive = <250>;
>> + polling-delay = <1000>;
>> +
>> + thermal-sensors = <&tsens0 7>;
>> +
>> + trips {
>> + cpu_alert4: trip0 {
>> + temperature = <75000>;
>> + hysteresis = <2000>;
>> + type = "passive";
>> + };
>> +
>> + cpu_crit4: trip1 {
>> + temperature = <110000>;
>> + hysteresis = <1000>;
>> + type = "critical";
>> + };
>> + };
>> + };
>> +
>> + cpu5-thermal {
>> + polling-delay-passive = <250>;
>> + polling-delay = <1000>;
>> +
>> + thermal-sensors = <&tsens0 8>;
>> +
>> + trips {
>> + cpu_alert5: trip0 {
>> + temperature = <75000>;
>> + hysteresis = <2000>;
>> + type = "passive";
>> + };
>> +
>> + cpu_crit5: trip1 {
>> + temperature = <110000>;
>> + hysteresis = <1000>;
>> + type = "critical";
>> + };
>> + };
>> + };
>> +
>> + cpu6-thermal {
>> + polling-delay-passive = <250>;
>> + polling-delay = <1000>;
>> +
>> + thermal-sensors = <&tsens0 9>;
>> +
>> + trips {
>> + cpu_alert6: trip0 {
>> + temperature = <75000>;
>> + hysteresis = <2000>;
>> + type = "passive";
>> + };
>> +
>> + cpu_crit6: trip1 {
>> + temperature = <110000>;
>> + hysteresis = <1000>;
>> + type = "critical";
>> + };
>> + };
>> + };
>> +
>> + cpu7-thermal {
>> + polling-delay-passive = <250>;
>> + polling-delay = <1000>;
>> +
>> + thermal-sensors = <&tsens0 10>;
>> +
>> + trips {
>> + cpu_alert7: trip0 {
>> + temperature = <75000>;
>> + hysteresis = <2000>;
>> + type = "passive";
>> + };
>> +
>> + cpu_crit7: trip1 {
>> + temperature = <110000>;
>> + hysteresis = <1000>;
>> + type = "critical";
>> + };
>> + };
>
> Dumb DT question: the trip information is the same for all CPUs. Would
> it be possible to have a single node and refer to it with a phandle?
There is some work to do that for cooling maps, not for the actual
trip points though:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/cover.1530766981.git.viresh.ku...@linaro.org/T/#u
> I suppose the anwer is no and even if it was possible we probably
> wouldn't want it, since it would complicate overriding settings for a
> specific CPU (should that ever be needed ...) or cluster. Just wondering.
>
>> + };
>> + };
>> };
>
> I don't have documentation to verify that the sensors and CPUs match,
> but it is in line with what I've seen in some Android tree, so it
> seems alright ;-)
>
> Reviewed-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <m...@chromium.org>
> Tested-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <m...@chromium.org>
Thanks Matthias.
Regards,
Amit
