On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 10:32:16AM +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
> wdt87xx_resume() is never called in atomic context.
> It calls mdelay() to busily wait, which is not necessary.
> mdelay() can be replaced with msleep().
> 
> This is found by a static analysis tool named DCNS written by myself.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1...@gmail.com>

Applied, thank you.

> ---
>  drivers/input/touchscreen/wdt87xx_i2c.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/wdt87xx_i2c.c 
> b/drivers/input/touchscreen/wdt87xx_i2c.c
> index 20f7f3902757..166edeb77776 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/touchscreen/wdt87xx_i2c.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/wdt87xx_i2c.c
> @@ -1142,7 +1142,7 @@ static int __maybe_unused wdt87xx_resume(struct device 
> *dev)
>        * The chip may have been reset while system is resuming,
>        * give it some time to settle.
>        */
> -     mdelay(100);
> +     msleep(100);
>  
>       error = wdt87xx_send_command(client, VND_CMD_START, 0);
>       if (error)
> -- 
> 2.17.0
> 

-- 
Dmitry

Reply via email to