On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 10:16 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > So patches 1-4 all look fine to me. In fact, 5 looks ok too.
Great! > Leaving patch 6 as a "only makes sense after we actually have some numbers > about it", and patch 5 is a "could go either way" as far as I'm concerned > (ie I could merge it together with the 1-4 series, but I think it's > equally valid to just see it as a companion to 6). Actually, in my next series, I removed patch 5 and just simply replace the tasklets with the workqueue implementation, leaving no config option. It will be out shortly, after I finish my testing. I also keep the file name tasklet_work.c instead of overwriting tasklet.c, just because it's easier to review the patch that way. -- Steve - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
