Byungchul Park <byungchul.p...@lge.com> writes: > Hello folks, > > I'm careful in saying.. and curious about.. > > In restrictive cases like only addtions happen but never deletion, can't > we safely traverse a llist? I believe llist can be more useful if we can > release the restriction. Can't we? > > If yes, we may add another function traversing starting from a head. Or > just use existing funtion with head->first. > > Thank a lot for your answers in advance :)
What's the use case? I don't know how it is useful that items are never deleted from the llist. Some other locks could be used to provide mutual exclusive between - llist add, llist traverse and - llist delete Is this your use case? Best Regards, Huang, Ying
