On Sat, 23 Jun 2007 00:07:15 +0200 Alberto Gonzalez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My conclusion is that SD behaves as expected: it's more fair. But for a > desktop, shouldn't an "intelligently unfair" scheduler be better? "intelligently unfair" is what the current scheduler is (because of interactivity estimator). When it works (say 90% of the time) the desktop feels really good... but when it doesn't it can be a disaster. Look this for example: http://groups.google.com/group/fa.linux.kernel/browse_thread/thread/6aa5c93c379ae9e1/98ab31c0e6fed2ee?&hl=en#98ab31c0e6fed2ee -- Paolo Ornati Linux 2.6.22-rc5-g0864a4e2 on x86_64 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
