On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 7:15 PM, Jason Gunthorpe <j...@ziepe.ca> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 05:00:37PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
>> From: Jason Gunthorpe <j...@mellanox.com>
>>
>> Add shift_overflow() helper to assist driver authors in ensuring that
>> shift operations don't cause overflows or other odd conditions.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <j...@mellanox.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leo...@mellanox.com>
>> [kees: tweaked comments and commit log, dropped unneeded assignment]
>> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keesc...@chromium.org>
>> ---
>>  include/linux/overflow.h | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 31 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/overflow.h b/include/linux/overflow.h
>> index 8712ff70995f..69fc366ce865 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/overflow.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/overflow.h
>> @@ -202,6 +202,37 @@
>>
>>  #endif /* COMPILER_HAS_GENERIC_BUILTIN_OVERFLOW */
>>
>> +/** check_shift_overflow() - Calculate a left-shifted value and check 
>> overflow
>> + *
>> + * @a: Value to be shifted
>> + * @b: How many bits left to shift
>
> The above @b should be @s

Ooops, copy-paste-o. :)

>
>> +#define check_shift_overflow(a, s, d) ({                             \
>
> Should I run this series through the rdma tree?

I'd like to get Rasmus's Ack, but otherwise, yes, that'd be fine.

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook
Pixel Security

Reply via email to