On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 10:17 AM <bseg...@google.com> wrote: > Yes, in practice what's actually going to happen is that the > runtime_remaining will be put to 1 by distribute, the cfs_rq will be > unthrottled, and then when it runs it will go negative immediately and > hit the negative check in expires, so expires_seq being wrong will not > actually matter. In addition, the worst thing that will happen if one of > the account_cfs_rq_runtime(cfs_rq, 0) paths is hit first is that it will > lose 1ns of quota, which also doesn't really matter.
Ah, I see. Thanks!
