Removal of three comments. The comments in question do not add anything
to the understanding of the code, and if they are necessary it would
imply that the structure and its member variables are badly named.

This is a simple style change and should have no impact on runtime
code execution.

Signed-off-by: John Whitmore <johnfwhitm...@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/rtl819x_TS.h | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/rtl819x_TS.h 
b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/rtl819x_TS.h
index 93984e8e87c3..924d4b373099 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/rtl819x_TS.h
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/rtl819x_TS.h
@@ -78,8 +78,8 @@ struct ts_common_info {
 struct tx_ts_record {
        struct ts_common_info           ts_common_info;
        u16                             tx_cur_seq;
-       BA_RECORD                       tx_pending_ba_record;   /*  For BA 
Originator */
-       BA_RECORD                       tx_admitted_ba_record;  /*  For BA 
Originator */
+       BA_RECORD                       tx_pending_ba_record;
+       BA_RECORD                       tx_admitted_ba_record;
        u8                              add_ba_req_in_progress;
        u8                              add_ba_req_delayed;
        u8                              using_ba;
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ struct rx_ts_record {
        u16                             rx_timeout_indicate_seq;
        struct list_head                rx_pending_pkt_list;
        struct timer_list               rx_pkt_pending_timer;
-       BA_RECORD                       rx_admitted_ba_record;   /*  For BA 
Recipient */
+       BA_RECORD                       rx_admitted_ba_record;
        u16                             rx_last_seq_num;
        u8                              rx_last_frag_num;
        u8                              num;
-- 
2.18.0

Reply via email to