On Tue, Aug 07, 2018 at 12:09:05PM +0300, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
> This function splits and removes overlapping areas.
> 
> Maps in tree are ordered by start address thus we could find
> first overlap and stop if next map does not overlap.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khlebnikov <[email protected]>
> ---
>  tools/perf/util/map.c |   21 ++++++++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/map.c b/tools/perf/util/map.c
> index 89ac5b5dc218..9b3f4d244ad4 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/map.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/map.c
> @@ -675,20 +675,35 @@ static void __map_groups__insert(struct map_groups *mg, 
> struct map *map)
>  static int maps__fixup_overlappings(struct maps *maps, struct map *map, FILE 
> *fp)
>  {
>       struct rb_root *root;
> -     struct rb_node *next;
> +     struct rb_node *next, *first;
>       int err = 0;
>  
>       down_write(&maps->lock);
>  
>       root = &maps->entries;
> -     next = rb_first(root);
>  
> +     /* find first where end > map->start, same as find_vma() */
> +     next = root->rb_node;
> +     first = NULL;
> +     while (next) {
> +             struct map *pos = rb_entry(next, struct map, rb_node);
> +
> +             if (pos->end > map->start) {
> +                     first = next;
> +                     if (pos->start <= map->start)
> +                             break;

please use in here the call to map__overlap as in the
while loop below.. we could change map__overlap to above
(yours) overlap check, seems more straight

> +                     next = next->rb_left;
> +             } else
> +                     next = next->rb_right;
> +     }
> +
> +     next = first;
>       while (next) {
>               struct map *pos = rb_entry(next, struct map, rb_node);
>               next = rb_next(&pos->rb_node);
>  
>               if (!map__overlap(pos, map))
> -                     continue;
> +                     break;

please put in ehre the comment from changelog,
that we could stop searching in here

thanks,
jirka

>  
>               if (verbose >= 2) {
>  
> 

Reply via email to