> Which simply does not work. Look at Goldmont Fam 6 Model 5C. The SoCs > with that Fam/Model combination are: > > - Apollo Lake > - Broxton (has two platforms: Morganfield and Willowtrail)
Right pick one. The others are the same for software purposes and can be handled in the same way. > > It's even worse with Silvermont. > > So no, the interesting information is the UARCH and the variant of that, With Uarch you mean the core uarch? That doesn't really work for something like Silvermont or Goldmont. > e.g. UARCH_CLIENT, UARCH_SERVER, UARCH_WHATEVER. All the magic Code Names Right your scheme totally doesn't work on Silvermont because there are multiple client variants. > and their platform variants are not interesting at all for the Fam/Model > information. You're right platform is misleading. I think the right level are SOCs, because that matches the how the model numbers are allocated. On Big Core *Lakes are all unique SOCs. -Andi
