> +config GOOGLE_COREBOOT_TABLE_ACPI
> + tristate
> + default GOOGLE_COREBOOT_TABLE
I don't think this helps in upgrading (as your commit message says)
unless you also keep the 'select GOOGLE_COREBOOT_TABLE' here, right?
> -int coreboot_table_init(struct device *dev, void __iomem *ptr)
> +static int coreboot_table_init(struct device *dev, void __iomem *ptr)
nit: There's little reason to keep coreboot_table_init() a separate
function now. Could maybe compact the code a little more if you merge
it into probe()? (Also could then do the signature sanity check before
trusting the length values to map the whole thing, which is probably a
good idea.)
> if (ptr_header) {
> bus_unregister(&coreboot_bus_type);
> iounmap(ptr_header);
Could ptr_header be handled by devm now, somehow? Also, don't you have
two bus_unregister() now (here and in coreboot_exit())? Or is that
intentional?
> +static struct platform_driver coreboot_table_driver = {
> + .probe = coreboot_table_probe,
> + .remove = coreboot_table_remove,
> + .driver = {
> + .name = "coreboot_table",
> + .acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(cros_coreboot_acpi_match),
> + .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(coreboot_of_match),
Who takes precedence if they both exist? Will we have two
coreboot_table busses? (That would probably not be so good...)
