On Thu, 9 Aug 2018 14:27:06 +0200
Thierry Reding <thierry.red...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 01, 2018 at 07:32:00PM +0300, Aapo Vienamo wrote:
> > Register a pinctrl device and implement get and set functions for
> > PIN_CONFIG_LOW_POWER_MODE and PIN_CONFIG_POWER_SOURCE parameters.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Aapo Vienamo <avien...@nvidia.com>
> > Acked-by: Jon Hunter <jonath...@nvidia.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c | 187
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 185 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c b/drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c
> [...]
> > @@ -1704,6 +1863,12 @@ static const u8 tegra124_cpu_powergates[] = {
> > .name = (_name), \
> > })
> >
> > +#define TEGRA_IO_PIN_DESC(_id, _dpd, _voltage, _name) \
> > + ((struct pinctrl_pin_desc) { \
> > + .number = (_id), \
> > + .name = (_name) \
> > + })
> > +
>
> Do we really need the explicit cast to struct pinctrl_pin_desc here?
>
No, but I prefer to have it as it makes the type of the value the macro
expands to explicit. In a way it hints at how and where the macro should
be used and arguably improves readability.
-Aapo
