On 2007.06.25 08:49:05 -0400, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > Björn Steinbrink wrote: > >On 2007.06.25 10:26:52 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > >>* Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> > >>>the winner is ... > >>> > >>> f8822f42019eceed19cc6c0f985a489e17796ed8 is first bad commit > >>> commit f8822f42019eceed19cc6c0f985a489e17796ed8 > >>> Author: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>> Date: Wed May 2 19:27:14 2007 +0200 > >>> > >>> [PATCH] i386: PARAVIRT: Consistently wrap paravirt ops callsites to > >>> make them patchable > >>> > >>and of course i'm happy to test any patch that is simpler than the > >>brutal revert i sent. > >> > > > >wrmsrl() looks broken, dropping the upper 32bits of the value to be > >written. Does this help? > > > > Crap. That's embarrassing. Does it help, because it seems likely? > (Esp since Ingo didn't even have CONFIG_PARAVIRT enabled, so most of his > revert would have been dead code anyway.)
He has. The config Ingo sent was for x86_64, which (AFAICT) doesn't have CONFIG_PARAVIRT, so the config was unfortunately useless. But his bootlog tells us: Booting paravirtualized kernel on bare hardware Björn - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
