Devicetree bindings should be their own patch as documented in
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.txt section I.1.
This is because bindings are logically independent from a driver
implementation, they have a different maintainer (even though they often
are applied via the same tree), and it makes for a cleaner history in
the DT only tree created with git-filter-branch.

Cc: Andy Whitcroft <a...@canonical.com>
Cc: Joe Perches <j...@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <r...@kernel.org>
---
 scripts/checkpatch.pl | 14 ++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)

diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
index a9c05506e325..fa9b50d6f3d4 100755
--- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
+++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
@@ -2236,6 +2236,7 @@ sub process {
        our $clean = 1;
        my $signoff = 0;
        my $is_patch = 0;
+       my $is_binding_patch = -1;
        my $in_header_lines = $file ? 0 : 1;
        my $in_commit_log = 0;          #Scanning lines before patch
        my $has_commit_log = 0;         #Encountered lines before patch
@@ -2485,6 +2486,19 @@ sub process {
                                $check = $check_orig;
                        }
                        $checklicenseline = 1;
+
+                       if ($realfile !~ /^MAINTAINERS/) {
+                               my $last_binding_patch = $is_binding_patch;
+
+                               $is_binding_patch = () = $realfile =~ 
m@^(?:Documentation/devicetree/|include/dt-bindings/)@;
+
+                               if (($last_binding_patch != -1) &&
+                                   ($last_binding_patch ^ $is_binding_patch)) {
+                                       WARN("DT_SPLIT_BINDING_PATCH",
+                                            "DT binding docs and includes 
should be a separate patch. See: 
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.txt\n");
+                               }
+                       }
+
                        next;
                }
 
-- 
2.17.1

Reply via email to