Hi Quentin! On 09-Aug 16:55, Quentin Perret wrote: > Hi Patrick, > > On Thursday 09 Aug 2018 at 16:41:56 (+0100), Patrick Bellasi wrote: > > > IIUC, not far below this you should still have something like: > > > > > > if (rt_rq_is_runnable(&rq->rt)) > > > return max; > > > > Do you mean that when RT tasks are RUNNABLE we still want to got to > > MAX? Not sure to understand... since this patch is actually to clamp > > the RT class... > > Argh, reading my message again it wasn't very clear indeed. Sorry about > that ... > > What I'm try to say is that your patch does _not_ remove the snippet of code > above from sugov_get_util(). So I think that when a RT task is runnable, > you will not reach the end of the function where the clamping is done. > And this is not what you want AFAICT. > > Does that make any sense ?
Oh gotcha... you right, I've missed that bit when I rebased on tip. Will fix on the next iteration! -- #include <best/regards.h> Patrick Bellasi
