Pavel Thanks for the review
On 08/08/2018 02:59 PM, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > >> Introduce the lm3697 LED driver for >> backlighting and display. >> >> Datasheet location: >> http://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/lm3697.pdf >> >> Signed-off-by: Dan Murphy <dmur...@ti.com> > >> + >> +#define LM3697_HVLED1_2_3_A 0 >> +#define LM3697_HVLED1_B_HVLED2_3_A 1 >> +#define LM3697_HVLED2_B_HVLED1_3_A 2 >> +#define LM3697_HVLED1_2_B_HVLED3_A 3 >> +#define LM3697_HVLED3_B_HVLED1_2_A 4 >> +#define LM3697_HVLED1_3_B_HVLED2_A 5 >> +#define LM3697_HVLED1_A_HVLED2_3_B 6 >> +#define LM3697_HVLED1_2_3_B 7 > > That's rather long and verbose way to describe a bitmap, right? It will be removed with v3 > >> +static const struct regmap_config lm3697_regmap_config = { >> + .reg_bits = 8, >> + .val_bits = 8, >> + >> + .max_register = LM3697_CTRL_ENABLE, >> + .reg_defaults = lm3697_reg_defs, >> + .num_reg_defaults = ARRAY_SIZE(lm3697_reg_defs), >> + .cache_type = REGCACHE_RBTREE, >> +}; > > Is rbtree good idea? You don't have that many registers. ack > >> +static int lm3697_init(struct lm3697 *priv) >> +{ >> + int ret; >> + > .... >> + regmap_write(priv->regmap, LM3697_RESET, LM3697_SW_RESET); > > No error checking required here? Ack > >> + if (priv->control_bank_config < LM3697_HVLED1_2_3_A || >> + priv->control_bank_config > LM3697_HVLED1_2_3_B) { >> + dev_err(&priv->client->dev, "Control bank configuration is out >> of range\n"); >> + ret = -EINVAL; >> + goto out; >> + } >> + >> + device_for_each_child_node(priv->dev, child) { >> + led = &priv->leds[i]; >> + >> + ret = fwnode_property_read_u32(child, "reg", >> &led->control_bank); >> + if (ret) { >> + dev_err(&priv->client->dev, "reg DT property >> missing\n"); >> + goto child_out; >> + } >> + >> + fwnode_property_read_string(child, "linux,default-trigger", >> + &led->led_dev.default_trigger); >> + >> + ret = fwnode_property_read_string(child, "label", &name); >> + if (ret) >> + snprintf(led->label, sizeof(led->label), >> + "%s::", priv->client->name); >> + else >> + snprintf(led->label, sizeof(led->label), >> + "%s:%s", priv->client->name, name); >> + >> + >> + led->priv = priv; >> + led->led_dev.name = led->label; >> + led->led_dev.brightness_set_blocking = lm3697_brightness_set; >> + >> + ret = devm_led_classdev_register(priv->dev, &led->led_dev); >> + if (ret) { >> + dev_err(&priv->client->dev, "led register err: %d\n", >> ret); >> + goto child_out; >> + } >> + >> + if (priv->control_bank_config == LM3697_HVLED1_2_3_A || >> + priv->control_bank_config == LM3697_HVLED1_2_3_B) >> + goto child_out; > > This checks if we have just one bank, I see it. Should it also check > the led actually uses the correct bank? It will be removed with v3 > >> + i++; >> + fwnode_handle_put(child); >> + } >> + >> +child_out: >> + fwnode_handle_put(child); > > Is not the fwnode_handle_put() done twice for non-error case? Ack > >> + ret = lm3697_init(led); >> + if (ret) >> + return ret; >> + >> + return ret; >> +} > > The if is not needed here. > Ack >> +static int lm3697_remove(struct i2c_client *client) >> +{ >> + struct lm3697 *led = i2c_get_clientdata(client); >> + int ret; >> + >> + ret = regmap_update_bits(led->regmap, LM3697_CTRL_ENABLE, >> + LM3697_CTRL_A_B_EN, 0); >> + if (ret) { >> + dev_err(&led->client->dev, "Failed to disable regulator\n"); >> + return ret; > > Misleading, this does nothing with regulators. Ack > > Pavel > -- ------------------ Dan Murphy
