On Tue, 2018-08-14 at 17:39 +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote: > While I have considered having nvme_nvm_register_sysfs() returning a > pointer I would then have to remove the 'static' declaration from the > nvm_dev_attr_group_12/20. > Which I didn't really like, either.
Hmm ... I don't see why the static declaration would have to be removed from nvm_dev_attr_group_12/20 if nvme_nvm_register_sysfs() would return a pointer? Am I perhaps missing something? Thanks, Bart.
