On 06/25/2007 05:38 PM, Loic Prylli wrote:

[cc: Andi]

> Processors synchronization in set_mtrr requires the .gate field
> to be set after .count field is properly initialized. Without an explicit
> barrier, the compiler was reordering those memory stores. That was sometimes
> causing a processor (in ipi_handler) to see the .gate change and
> decrement .count before the latter is set by set_mtrr() (which
> then hangs in a infinite loop with irqs disabled).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Loic Prylli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
>  arch/i386/kernel/cpu/mtrr/main.c |    4 ++++
>  1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/mtrr/main.c 
> b/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/mtrr/main.c
> index 55b0051..75dc6d5 100644
> --- a/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/mtrr/main.c
> +++ b/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/mtrr/main.c
> @@ -229,6 +229,8 @@ static void set_mtrr(unsigned int reg, unsigned long base,
>       data.smp_size = size;
>       data.smp_type = type;
>       atomic_set(&data.count, num_booting_cpus() - 1);
> +     /* make sure data.count is visible before unleashing other CPUs */
> +     smp_wmb();
>       atomic_set(&data.gate,0);
>  
>       /*  Start the ball rolling on other CPUs  */
> @@ -242,6 +244,7 @@ static void set_mtrr(unsigned int reg, unsigned long base,
>  
>       /* ok, reset count and toggle gate */
>       atomic_set(&data.count, num_booting_cpus() - 1);
> +     smp_wmb();
>       atomic_set(&data.gate,1);
>  
>       /* do our MTRR business */
> @@ -260,6 +263,7 @@ static void set_mtrr(unsigned int reg, unsigned long base,
>               cpu_relax();
>  
>       atomic_set(&data.count, num_booting_cpus() - 1);
> +     smp_wmb();
>       atomic_set(&data.gate,0);
>  
>       /*
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to