On 08/16/18 at 09:43am, Yannik Sembritzki wrote: > On 16.08.2018 03:11, Dave Young wrote: > > Instead of fix your 1st patch in 2nd patch, I would suggest to > > switch the patch order. In 1st patch change the common code to use > > the new macro and in 2nd patch you can directly fix the kexec code > > with TRUST_SECONDARY_KEYRING. > My reasoning for doing it in this order was that the first patch which > fixes the bug itself should be merged into stable, while the refactoring > doesn't necessarily have to. I'm not familiar with the linux development > process, so please correct me if this should be done in another fashion.
Frankly I'm not sure about the stable process. But personally I do not like the order. Cced Greg for opinions about stable concern. > > Yannik
